Ask every research report like a private analyst.
ResearchEdge turns static PDFs into a searchable research workspace for analysts and client-facing teams, with answers tied back to source material.
The real bottleneck
The issue is not research quality. It is access after publication.
Your best work may already exist across reports. The opportunity is making that knowledge searchable, reviewable, and useful when a new analyst or client question appears.
Static PDFs
Published research is valuable, but it becomes hard to reuse once it lives across folders, inboxes, and portals.
Manual context switching
Analysts need to jump between reports, models, notes, and client questions before they can answer with confidence.
Client access gap
Clients often need a guided way to explore approved research without waiting for a new call or custom PDF.
Product experience
A research layer your team can actually evaluate.
Evaluate the parts that matter before rollout: answer quality, source coverage, permissions, and client-ready workflows.
Ask across a report library
Search earnings notes, sector reports, macro briefs, and company updates through natural-language questions.
Keep answers tied to sources
Show the reports and excerpts behind an answer so analysts can review context before sharing it.
Compare companies and themes
Evaluate a question across quarters, sectors, regions, holdings, or recurring risk factors.
Create a branded research experience
Package the workflow for internal teams or client-facing research portals with your brand and permissions.
Answers should accelerate judgment, not replace it.
ResearchEdge is positioned as a source-aware workspace: analysts ask broader questions, inspect the citations, and decide what is ready for internal or client-facing use.
FX volatility appears in three reports, mostly tied to imported infrastructure costs.
Customer concentration is repeated in enterprise software coverage.
Funding conditions are discussed as a constraint for smaller listed names.
Pilot path
What you can validate before making a bigger commitment.
Start with your own material and decide expansion based on answer usefulness, source quality, and workflow fit.
Bring a sample set
Start with a focused group of reports that represents your real coverage and client questions.
Test real workflows
Run analyst and client-style questions, then inspect answer quality, citations, and missing context.
Define expansion criteria
Decide what needs to be true before adding more reports, users, integrations, or white-label access.
Designed for controlled research access.
Proprietary research needs careful boundaries: permissioning, reviewability, activity history, and a clear pilot scope before sensitive material is uploaded.
Explore a pilot with your own research reports.
Bring a sample report set, the questions your team gets most often, and the access rules you need to respect. We will help scope a focused evaluation.
No credit card required. White-label options can be reviewed during pilot scoping.